Here, the functionf() is applied toAx in a component-wise manner. The above model arises in many applications of signal processing [13, 10, 41], communications [56, 9, 25], and machine learning [48, 40].

It turns out that the "spikiness" (or conversely "flatness") of the spectrum of the sensing

Approximate Leave-One-Out Cross-Validation (ALO-CV) is a method that has been proposed to estimate the generalization error of a regularized estimator in the high-dimensional regime where dimension and sample size are of the same order, the so called ``proportional regime''. A new analysis is developed to derive the consistency of ALO-CV for non-differentiable regularizer under Gaussian covariates and strong-convexity of the regularizer. Using a conditioning argument, the difference between the ALO-CV weights and their counterparts in mean-field inference is shown to be small. Combined with upper bounds between the mean-field inference estimate and the leave-one-out quantity, this provides a proof that ALO-CV approximates the leave-one-out quantity as well up to negligible error terms. Linear models with square loss, robust linear regression and single-index models are explicitly treated.

Despite a large and significant body of recent work focused on estimating the out-of-sample risk of regularized models in the high dimensional regime, a theoretical understanding of this problem for non-differentiable penalties such as generalized LASSO and nuclear norm is missing. In this paper we resolve this challenge. We study this problem in the proportional high dimensional regime where both the sample size n and number of features p are large, and n/p and the signal-to-noise ratio (per observation) remain finite. We provide finite sample upper bounds on the expected squared error of leave-one-out cross-validation (LO) in estimating the out-of-sample risk. The theoretical framework presented here provides a solid foundation for elucidating empirical findings that show the accuracy of LO.

The out-of-sample error (OO) is the main quantity of interest in risk estimation and model selection. Leave-one-out cross validation (LO) offers a (nearly) distribution-free yet computationally demanding approach to estimate OO. Recent theoretical work showed that approximate leave-one-out cross validation (ALO) is a computationally efficient and statistically reliable estimate of LO (and OO) for generalized linear models with differentiable regularizers. For problems involving non-differentiable regularizers, despite significant empirical evidence, the theoretical understanding of ALO's error remains unknown. In this paper, we present a novel theory for a wide class of problems in the generalized linear model family with non-differentiable regularizers. We bound the error |ALO - LO| in terms of intuitive metrics such as the size of leave-i-out perturbations in active sets, sample size n, number of features p and regularization parameters. As a consequence, for the $\ell_1$-regularized problems, we show that |ALO - LO| goes to zero as p goes to infinity while n/p and SNR are fixed and bounded.

Risk estimation is at the core of many learning systems. The importance of this problem has motivated researchers to propose different schemes, such as cross validation, generalized cross validation, and Bootstrap. The theoretical properties of such estimates have been extensively studied in the low-dimensional settings, where the number of predictors $p$ is much smaller than the number of observations $n$. However, a unifying methodology accompanied with a rigorous theory is lacking in high-dimensional settings. This paper studies the problem of risk estimation under the high-dimensional asymptotic setting $n,p \rightarrow \infty$ and $n/p \rightarrow \delta$ ($\delta$ is a fixed number), and proves the consistency of three risk estimates that have been successful in numerical studies, i.e., leave-one-out cross validation (LOOCV), approximate leave-one-out (ALO), and approximate message passing (AMP)-based techniques. A corner stone of our analysis is a bound that we obtain on the discrepancy of the `residuals' obtained from AMP and LOOCV. This connection not only enables us to obtain a more refined information on the estimates of AMP, ALO, and LOOCV, but also offers an upper bound on the convergence rate of each estimate.